May 17, 2020

In Search of Behemoth Porphyries in British Columbia's Golden Triangle

Prosper Gold
Garibaldi Resources
Imperial Metals
Taseko
Admin
6 min
Mine shaft in British Columbia
In July 1970, a mining company called Great Plains Development Co. of Canada was in the process of drilling two exploratory holes into its “Chris...

In July 1970, a mining company called Great Plains Development Co. of Canada was in the process of drilling two exploratory holes into its “Chris” claims in northern British Columbia. These two holes would lead to a series of events that would culminate in the development of the Red Chris Mine, scheduled to begin production by May of next year.

The mine will process an astounding 30,000 tonnes of copper-gold-silver-infused rock every day for the duration of its 28-year mine life. It is expected to generate a net present value (NPV) of at least $423 million.

The circumstances of Red Chris’ acquisition were also extraordinary. After a bidding war with Taseko Mines, Imperial Mines purchased the project from bcMetals for $1.70 per share – almost triple bcMetals’ share price, one of the largest premiums in Canadian merger and acquisition history.

Unearthing Great Potential

The region in which Red Chris lies is known as the Golden Triangle. According to the B.C. Geological Survey Minfile database, more than 900 documented mineral occurrences have been identified within the Golden Triangle, of which 67 have some documented mineral resources.

The region is home to numerous porphyry copper-gold mines and advanced exploration projects collectively worth hundreds of billions of dollars. These include numerous projects similar to Red Chris such as Eskay Creek, Galore Creek and Schaft Creek.

Standouts among the many earlier stage projects are Prosper Gold’s (TSXV:PGX) Sheslay Project and neighbors Garibaldi Resources’ (TSXV:GGI) Grizzly Project, as well as Colorado Resources’ North Rok Project, and appear to share numerous characteristics with the larger porphyries in the region.

Fifteen kilometers northwest of Red Chris is Colorado Resources’ North Rok, which in April this year yielded impressive drill results: 333 meters at 0.51 percent copper and 0.67 g/t gold, starting very close to surface, with as much as 180 meters at 0.76 percent copper and 1 g/t Au starting 63 meters downhole.

The discovery at North Rok has rekindled investor interest in the region, and has also led a number of companies to re-examine historic data on their own projects in the region.

According to Prosper Gold’s co-founder, veteran geologist and British Columbia Geological Survey alumnus Dirk Tempelman-Kluit, although there is historical data available on his Sheslay project, no exploration companies have hit the area particularly hard with exploration dollars.

It wasn’t until Sheslay project was acquired by Firesteel Resources that the potential of Sheslay would finally become understood. Over the course of the ’80s, Firesteel invested $1.7 million into exploration on the Sheslay project, including sampling, trenching, geophysics, mapping, IP surveys and drilling.

Of Firesteel’s 26 holes in the Star zone, 25 fall within an area measuring about 300 meters by 300 meters. The weighted average across all 10 holes was 0.34 percent copper and 0.17 g/t gold. This compares favourably with other major alkalic porphyry deposits. For example, Schaft Creek had total resources of 1.3 billion tonnes grading 0.25 percent Cu and 0.18 g/t Au. Red Chris has reserves of 300 million tonnes grading 0.359 percent copper and 0.274 g/t.

“There were 26 holes and every hole had good numbers,” Tempelman-Kluit says. “Many holes had good numbers top to bottom. This was the kind of alteration and mineralization that you would expect to see – and want to see. Most of the time it takes hundreds of holes to define these deposits. To have these kinds of numbers at this stage of the game is pretty amazing.”

For its part, management at Garibaldi Resources, whose Grizzly Project borders the Sheslay Project, has no intention of riding the coat tails of the fast moving Prosper Gold. CEO Steve Regoci told me that although the company has been focused on its Mexican operations, including a small cash-flow positive coal project in Sonora, events at Sheslay and North Rok have prompted the company to act.

“The story in the Stikine Arch region has really happened very quickly over the last couple of months, with Colorado’s big hole and Prosper coming on the scene,” Regoci said. “The fact that the guys at Prosper have gone ahead and taken on the Sheslay project after their success at Blackwater project is really the best of both worlds for us – we get to have our cake and eat it too.”

Tempelman-Kluit and CEO Pete Bernier formed Richfield Ventures in 2005, and by 2011 had announced an initial resource estimate on the Blackwater Gold Project of 4.2 million ounces gold. Richfield was purchased by Newgold in 2011 for $550 million ($10.38 per share), making the duo and their shareholders all significantly wealthier – all in just over five years.

For their success, Tempelman-Kluit and Bernier were awarded the 2011 AME BC Award for Excellence in Prospecting and Mineral Exploration.

It took the team of Bernier and Tempelman-Kluit two years to find the Sheslay project, and option it from the cash strapped Firesteel team. Since then, Prosper’s first six drill holes at the Star Zone have delivered excellent numbers, improving on the historical results with longer intercepts and slightly better grades than average.

Rapid Expansion Potential

With mineralization starting at or very close to surface, and with mineralization open in all directions, there is a great possibility that this project will expand rapidly once drilling begins in earnest, next summer. As with all low-grade projects of this kind, the key will be low operating and capital costs and high tonnage.

For its part, Garibaldi’s Grizzly project appears to host the same type of alteration as Sheslay. An airborne geophysical study along with new IP data on both the Grizzly project and the southern part of the Sheslay project suggests that the chargeability signature found on the Sheslay project continues onto the Grizzly project.

Like Red Chris and other behemoths discovered before it, it may take some years before Sheslay, Grizzly or North Rok become mines, if they ever do at all. Deposits like these are often difficult to find because at surface they have a smaller geochemical “footprint” than other porphyries.

Both will be helped along by new infrastructure projects in the region, which historically has lagged behind other jurisdictions. In 2011, the federal government approved the Northwest Transmission Line, which will deliver cheap, reliable power – one of the single largest costs for operating mines.

For both Prosper Gold and Garibaldi Resources, one would think the end goal is to identify a sizeable resource and sell it to one of the nearby majors with experience advancing large porphyry deposits into mines: Teck, which borders Grizzly to the south, Imperial Metals, Taseko, Thompson Creek or even AuRico, all have interests in the region. There are bound to be European and Asian suitors too, hungry for more copper and gold reserves.

For most juniors, once you’re a few hundred million tonnes into exploring one of these billion-tonne-potential-deposits, a takeover is the only way to go. And as Bernier and Tempelton-Kluit learned with Richfield, and bcMetals learned with Red Chris, early success can be extremely rewarding.

 

About the author

Doug Hadfield is managing editor and vice president operations at resourceINTELLIGENCE. 

www.rivideosolutions.com www.resourceintelligence.net

Share article

May 5, 2021

Mining 4.0: How innovation is shaping mines of the future

Bently Nevada
Baker Hughes
Digital Transformation
Industry 4.0
Benjamin Byrne & Chris Engdahl
8 min
How mining's place in the fourth industrial revolution holds the key to the world's carbon neutral future

Mining may be the gateway to the world’s carbon neutral future.  Green energy storage systems, for one, are largely dependent on minerals. According to the World Bank Group, clean energy needs will escalate demand for rare earth minerals by nearly 500% by 2050.

While this growing demand holds much promise for mining companies, it also creates new challenges. Mining operators must navigate the ever-present highly cyclical market conditions and capital-intense operations. Recent trends layer on additional challenges, such as the progressive retirement of the industry’s most experienced workers, increasing regulatory pressures, and rising energy costs. To proactively manage these multiple challenges and capitalize on rising demand, mining companies must innovate and lower operating costs to remain both profitable and viable. 

Why the urgent need for innovation?

Leading mining companies have shown that lower operating expense (OpEx) is a pre-requisite to on-going business success. This need is driven by the cyclical mining market and ever present,, hefty capital requirements, both of which are inherent in the mining industry. And, when demand is high, the OpEx cost component of unplanned downtime grows steeper. Data indicates that, in mining operations, the root cause of OpEx overages lies in maintenance issues that impede operating efficiencies and incur unnecessary costs. Left unaddressed, these gaps will prevent mining companies from fully capitalizing on increasing demand. 

According to McKinsey, mining companies have historically struggled with significant productivity declines, as shown below. In recent years, there is evidence that a slow recovery is underway, however, full resolution is in its’ infancy, primarily rooted in maintenance cost optimization.

Mining Productivity Index

Other data points on current mining operations underscore the urgent call for innovation and change:

  • 70%  operating efficiency due to breakdowns and stalled production, which translates to real potential for increased productivity and throughput
  • 30-50% of mining operations costs spent on maintaining plant, fleet and equipment, so, the magnitude of potential improvements on bottom-line profitability is significant
  • 3-5X cost for urgent repairs and corrective work requests versus planned maintenance, often made evident by tracking the percentage of work orders managed through the planning office.

While change is always difficult, the promise of technology (and Industry 4.0, Mining 4.0) is a welcome and required one for mining companies.  Digital technologies and automation, or Mining 4.0, is defined by smart equipment, drive data-driven (and thus better) decisions, catalyze connected communications and provide easier, more affordable maintenance. From there, mining companies will be able to speed up production, reduce downtime and boost employee safety – three pillars that have challenged mining operations for years.

The first step: Predictive maintenance via condition monitoring

As the first step to regain operational optimization and lower costs, mining companies must get “ahead of the curve” and prevent process interruptions and unplanned downtime. The key is predictive maintenance via condition monitoring systems.  By proactively assessing equipment health, mining operators can be alerted to developing failures before they occur and schedule planned repairs at the lowest possible cost and with minimal impact to production.

Condition monitoring systems are based on the principal that failure is a process, not an event. By monitoring asset characteristics, latent anomalies become apparent well before full failure, allowing for low-cost interventions, root-cause analysis and proactive planning for resolution, thereby mitigating process interruptions. Concurrent with deployment of well-engineered predictive maintenance strategy, a thorough rationalization review can minimize unnecessary or redundant maintenance tasks and, in many cases, eliminate human-induced failure modes.

Maintenance optimization is a powerful lever – and the first step -- to achieving and sustaining lower production costs in mining.

When 14% equals $8 million

Consider this PwC mining example, where predictive maintenance enabled a 14% reduction in maintenance spend by mitigating unplanned downtime to deliver US $8 million savings in operating expense (OpEx).

Goal: Reduce unplanned downtime

Solution: Condition monitoring system on critical equipment

Process:

  1. Condition monitoring insights provide operator alerts of potential failures.
  2. Proactive scheduling of repairs moves resolution to occur during planned maintenance, partial outage periods or normal equipment rotations.
  3. Asset availability and reliability increases, production interruptions are minimized and maintenance costs are reduced.

Result: 14% reduction in maintenance spend generates US $8 million in OpEx

PwC
Source: PwC “Balancing Uptime and Working Capital: Maintenance and Inventory Strategies in Mining”

Reliability and employee safety

The example above illustrates the dramatic improvements to operating expense as mining operators move from reactive / unplanned to proactive / planned maintenance. With decreased downtime, overall operational reliability also improves and with it, a metric of paramount importance in mining: employee safety.

Studies indicate that more reliable operations are safer operations. That’s because technology serves to reduce human-to-machine interaction and urgent, reactive work declines.  For one industrial company, as shown in the graph below, an OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) improvement of 52% delivered a safety improvement of 69% during a 10-year period. 

Reliability

 

Customer Case Study: Slurry pumps

Let’s look at specific mining applications ripe for optimization and maintenance cost savings.  The first is slurry pumps. In mining pumping stations, pump failures are responsible for 97% of unplanned maintenance costs. Pump reliability, however, is crucial in the areas of safety, environmental impact, and efficient transportation.

Key characteristics of slurry pumps can be monitored so that timely analysis of impending issues enable early detection of issues at inception and prior to failure. This avoids unplanned maintenance, unplanned downtime, and averts lost revenue.

In slurry pump applications, dynamic pressure sensors can be used to detect reciprocating diaphragm failures, providing a novel diagnostic to increase pump reliability. The solution is based on these design principles:

  • The hydraulic fluid flexes the diaphragm
  • When the diaphragm flexes, slurry is discharged
  • Abrasive, corrosive slurries prohibit pressure sensor installations in slurry valves
  • Thus, dynamic pressure monitoring of the hydraulic fluid assesses the effectiveness of slurry discharge

The result?  A savings of US $3 million per year, based on maintenance cost recovery and capacity increases for a 10-pump station.

Customer Case Study:  Haul Trucks

In mining operations, haul trucks are another critical asset, as they are relied upon to move raw materials.  Alignment of extraction speed to transportation speed is required to keep operations flowing smoothly.  Mining operators have invested in larger, automated haul trucks to facilitate this timing alignment and optimize logistics. Thus, haul trucks and their operational health is a key enabler of production reliability in mining operations.

Monitoring haul truck health to ensure reliability, however, presents unique challenges.  Because haul trucks are in constant motion, data collection at precise and crucial times with linkage to a monitoring center and diagnostics requires innovative thinking and design.

For one mining company, a custom engineered solution for the haul truck’s control system was designed and installed.  The system was devised to monitor haul truck health in two distinct operating states so that changes in the various failure mode characteristics could be accurately identified:

  1. Running and loaded. In this state, vibration data is collected while the truck is running, loaded and in reverse mode (braking the truck using the electric motor of the electric wheels).
  2. Unloading. During unloading, vibration monitoring data is collected when the haul truck dump or bucket is being raised.

The result?  An estimated savings of US $5 million per year, based on an iron mine fleet of 30 trucks operating at 80% capacity. 

Outcomes like the examples above are possible for mining operations via innovative condition monitoring systems. There are many other condition monitoring mining applications, such as wireless sensors for hoist systems and continuous monitoring for SAG (semi-autogenous grinding) mills that deliver transformational outcomes.  The ultimate payoff for mining companies occurs when these applications and systems scale and interconnect into an operation-wide solution, enabling more holistic optimization.

Benefits of condition monitoring

Condition monitoring is part of Mining 4.0, the transformation driven by the adoption of automation and digital technologies. Mining 4.0 inherently supports the infrastructure and process requirements for condition monitoring systems. Specifically, Mining 4.0 will facilitate capabilities such as digitization, automation, analytics, artificial intelligence and machine learning, establishing a powerful foundation for predictive maintenance solutions and innovation.

Technology and predictive maintenance benefits have the potential to transform mining operations, starting with condition monitoring. In addition to managing and minimizing the impact of failures, mitigating downtime and reducing maintenance costs, condition monitoring systems also help to increase worker safety, reduce energy consumption and meet environmental requirements.

These benefits unleash significant potential for radical and positive changes in mining operations. All condition monitoring systems, however, vary in scope and effectiveness, so proper selection of a design and enablement provider with full-scale capabilities and proven expertise can impact outcomes significantly.

Innovation beyond technology

While innovation and transformation hold great potential, mining companies must go beyond reducing maintenance costs and implementing technology solutions. Companies must work differently and work smarter to capitalize on the full potential of digital technologies and holistic data strategies that deliver operation-wide benefits. For successful adoption, overcoming internal organizational barriers and cultural challenges to digital adoption is equally essential.  

To reduce pressure on capital-intense mining operations, condition monitoring solutions can be “self-funding” initiatives on the journey toward Mining 4.0 as operational benefits of condition monitoring are realized progressively from the early stages of implementation.

The way forward for mining companies is clear -- and full of promise. As the world increasingly relies on mining to produce the minerals needed for green energy, innovative mining leaders will usher in an era of profound global transformation that ultimately benefits us all.

To learn more about condition monitoring systems in mining operations, please reach out to speak with one of us or another experienced professional at Baker Hughes.

Share article